Red rag to a bull
Rick Mazeroski is a
bully. He's also the son of the Sheriff. Maybe his behaviour is a form of
emulation? As his dad pushes him around, so he feels he must push others around
to live up to his father's image of masculinity? As Sheriff, his father is a
leader, and Rick, too, is a leader - in his case, of a group of teenagers.
Driving down the
street one evening, Rick and his friends stop to have fun at the expense of a
boy about the same age, but who is strikingly different. This youth is a member
of the Red Museum,
a "monument to barbarism", vegetarians is cow-country. He carries
himself differently, he dresses differently and, clearly, has not just
different ideas but ideas diametrically opposed to the youths in Rick's little
gang.
He is literally, due
to the color of his turban, a red rag to a bull. And the bull, Rick Mazeroski,
responds in the only way he knows how; he charges.
On this occasion,
the boy from the Red Museum is fortunate, for Mulder intervenes.
Probably unused to
people standing up to him, more because of who his father is than for Rick
himself, the bully acts according to type. Unable to physically impose himself
on Mulder, the little man tries out some big words. On seeing the approach of
Scully, Rick taunts Mulder: "Yeah, well,
why don't you run along with the little wife? You're going to miss the tour bus."
The scene doesn't work out well for Rick and he is forced to retreat, pushing
past Mulder as he slopes off.
Ditch the Label,
which claims to be one of the biggest anti-bullying charities in the world,
suggests several reasons why people bully others. A number of these reasons
could apply to Rick. There is no sign of his mother throughout the episode. If
this is a recent development due to her leaving or her death, it could be the
cause of stress or trauma and, not being one to admit to or discuss his
feelings, Rick expresses himself in fairly typical male fashion. Aggressive
behaviour is another cause listed on ditchthelabel.org,
with 66% of respondents to their annual survey who admitted to having bullied
others being male. Rick is certainly an aggressive young man.
If not out of
trauma, Rick could be reacting to feelings of insecurity or rejection. The
latter, again, may stem from the leaving of his mother or, equally, from a
father, dedicated to his job, spending little time at home, showing little
affection to his son.
Whatever the reason
for or cause of Rick's behaviour, there is no excuse for tormenting another.
Nor does that other person's being different justify maltreatment.
But human beings
never act without reason, whether it be conscious or unconscious. Understanding
the reasons for bullying, or any other form of human behaviour, may help
organizations like Ditch the Label
provide support to both the bully and the bullied but, ultimately, will never
eradicate the behaviour.
Knowing that Rick
needs a father-figure to look up to and emulate gives us a way to help him
overcome his need to act out his aggressions on others. Providing him with more
positive role-models to emulate could well be a way to enable him to confront
his bullying and learn there are other ways to deal with the feelings that need
to be expressed lest they lead to the self-destruction that is their inevitable
end.
This is no
liberal-minded, do-gooder approach. It is the only possible approach in a world
that prides itself on having achieved individuality for all. There are fewer
connections between human beings today than there has ever been in our past,
fewer lessons that are learned collectively, less of a sense of community in
which each is accountable and responsible for each other.
Rick's behaviour may
stem from any of the reasons mentioned but, more than any of these, it stems
from the reality of his - and our - situation of having no one but a distant
father to look to for guidance. Gone are the equally authoritative and responsible
others who, once upon a time, would have had both the right to chastise
aberrant behaviour and the responsibility to provide the security missing in
Rick's life. With fewer people to rely on, the chances of making wrong choices
increases.
Comments
Post a Comment